Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› Family Tree

A question about a daughter who was not adopted

System
System admin
January 27, 2022 edited July 16, 2024 in Family Tree
This discussion was created from comments split from: Becoming a new member.
0

Comments

  • Claire Graham Morelli
    Claire Graham Morelli ✭
    January 27, 2022

    Thank you sir for your courtesy.


    I also have a question regarding something I received on Family Search. It regards a Thomas W. Houts. Many years ago a Major and Mrs. Houts in Warrensburg, Johnson Co, Missouri took in the newborn baby girl from a young lady who had unfortunantely gotten herself into trouble, so to speak.

    Major and Mrs. Houts raised the little girl, whom they named Nellie Agnes Houts. Turns out Nellie Agnes Houts was never adopted --which wouldn't work with research anyway--and eventually the family learned she was actually Nellie agnes Crites.


    Thanks you


    Claire G Morelli

    0
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 27, 2022

    @Claire Graham Morelli

    Claire

    Regarding, the "Types", of "Parent-Child" Relationships, in the "Family Tree" Part, of 'FamilySearch' ...

    One is NOT, limited, to just, "Biological"; NOR "Adopted" ...

    The existing "Types", of "Parent-Child" Relationships, in the "Family Tree" Part, of 'FamilySearch', are:

    ▬ Biological; or,

    ▬ Adopted; or,

    ▬ Step; or,

    ▬ Foster; or,

    ▬ Guardianship.

    Plus ...

    A Child, CAN, have MORE than ONE, "Set" of Parents.

    And, those DIFFERENT, "Sets" of Parents, WILL have different "Types", of "Parent-Child" Relationships, with the Child.

    In the case, that you reference ...

    The Child CAN have ...

    [ For Example ... ]

    In the "Vitals" Section:

    ▬ The "Birth" Name of Nellie Agnes CRITES

    In the "Other Information" Section:

    ▬ The "Alternate Name" of Nellie Agnes HOUTS

    In the "Family Members" Section:

    ▬ A "Biological" Set of Parents (either, BOTH; or, just ONE, if ONLY one is known)

    .... Where, the "Type", of "Parent-Child" Relationships; as, "Biological";

    and,

    ▬ A SECOND Set of Parents, in this case, Major and Mrs. HOUTS

    .... Where, the "Type", of "Parent-Child" Relationships; as, "Guardianship".

    I hope, that this makes sense; and, helps/assists.

    Brett

    1
  • Gail Swihart Watson
    Gail Swihart Watson ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 27, 2022

    I have exactly one case like that in my family and I was requested to use “foster” as the relationship. The foster mother is the only one who knew the baby’s birth identity, so the story goes, and took the secret to her grave. I have not tried to investigate the baby’s identity; it appears her life was very happy. I inherited photos of her and with a direct ancestor of mine long ago when they were teenaged girls (1913), and only recently did I find out the story. In fact it was through FamilySearch. After I built that family group, a 3rd cousin messaged me and asked me to change the relationship to foster. There are many descendants, so I anticipate finding the birth name entered some day.

    0
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 42.7K Ask a Question
  • 3.3K General Questions
  • 570 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.7K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 640 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.5K Family Tree
  • 5.1K Search
  • 996 Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 473 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups