Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Temple

On my person page the system says I have 300 Temple Ordinances reserved. I count 102. Why different?

Jan Elizabeth Jones
Jan Elizabeth Jones ✭
January 26 in Temple

The system says I have 300 ordinances reserved on my person page. I counted them. There are only 102. Why won't the system allow me to reserve more?

Tagged:
  • temple reservations
0

Answers

  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 26

    @Jan Elizabeth Jones

    Jan

    I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...

    [ And, I happen to be a Member of the Church ... ]

    Just in passing ...

    On your "List" of "Reservations" ...

    Question: Are you counting individual "Records" (ie. "Lines"); or, are you just counting People.

    An individual/person, may have MORE than ONE "Record" (ie. "Line"), in your "List".

    An individual/person CAN have MULTIPLE "Records" (ie. "Lines"), in your "List".

    And, as such, EACH "Record" (ie. "Line") is counted separately (and, individually).

    You CANNOT, count MORE, than ONE Recorded instance (ie. "Line"), of an individual/person, at a time.

    Does that, make up the difference, to the x300 Maximum ...

    Just a thought.

    Brett

    0
  • Jan Elizabeth Jones
    Jan Elizabeth Jones ✭
    February 8

    Hi Brett:

    Thank you for responding.

    I counted each ordinance separately. Not by person.

    Good differentiation, though.

    0
  • Gordon Collett
    Gordon Collett ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 8

    Have you shared any with a Family Group? Those also count towards your 300 limit.

    Ones shared with the temple do not. Move ordinances to that list to be able to reserve more.

    0
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    February 8

    @Jan Elizabeth Jones

    Jan

    O.K. ...

    Just in passing ...

    Further to; and, in support of. what 'Gordon', has proffered ...

    "Temple" Work, that has been "Shared" WITH a "Family Group", DOES NOT get RELEASED, from your "List", of "Reservations" (ie. "My Reservations"); UNTIL, such time; as, a member, of that "Family Group", actually "Reserves", that Work, to be responsible for; and, undertake.

    And ...

    IF, a member of the "Family Group", who so "Reserves", takes on, the Work, that you "Shared" WITH the "Family Group"; but, DOES NOT, undertake; and, "Complete," the Work, in any required time frame; THEN, the "Reservation", WILL "Return", to you; UNLESS, the "Period", of your "Reservation", has "Expired"; where, in such cases, the "System", will AUTONATICALLY, "Share with the Temple System".

    Plus ...

    In addition, to what 'Gordon', has proffered ...

    Any "Temple" Work, that you have "Reserved", that was "Share[d] with the Temple System", by ANOTHER User/Patron; SINCE, the (Worldwide) "COVID-19" Pandemic, has NOT automatically "Expired", after the usual x90 Days (ie. Period); as, NORMAL; because, such "Period", has been CONTINUALLY "Extended", by the "System"; plus, will REMAIN being "Extended", by the "System"; UNTIL, ALL the "Temples", around the World, are "Operating", under "Phase 4" (ie. Pre.COVID-19) conditions.

    Now ...

    All That Said ...

    Question: Does all that, make make any difference, in your "Count"?

    As, as far as I am aware, the "System" COUNT, for one's x300 "Limit", DOES NOT appear to be incorrect.

    [ UNLESS, of course, you have PRROF, that "Temple" Work, HAS been "Completed"; but, in NOT recorded ... ]

    [ But, almost x200; as, in your case, would seem, a little too incomprehensible ... ]

    Just my thought.

    Brett

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 22.7K All Categories
  • 372 1950 US Census
  • 46K FamilySearch Help
  • 92 Get Involved
  • 2.3K General Questions
  • 329 Family History Centers
  • 324 FamilySearch Account
  • 3.2K Family Tree
  • 2.5K Search
  • 3.6K Indexing
  • 433 Memories
  • 4.3K Temple
  • 250 Other Languages
  • 29 Community News
  • 5.3K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups