Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› Ask a Question› General Questions

What happened in history to show such old fashioned spelling mixed with modern ones?

dduncan4103573
dduncan4103573 ✭
January 10, 2022 edited July 9, 2024 in General Questions

I have traced a paternal line back to the 1600’s. Francis Baudison married Dorothy Wasse in 1671 in Braithwell, Yorkshire. But when I go to his father, the names change to old style language…his father is Franciscus Baudison, died 1698 and the mother is Margareta Bawdison, died 1699. John becomes Johannes, William becomes Gulielmus, etc., but it is not the case for other names like Elizabeth Arnold which follows Margaret. These records are typed, so definitely completed recently. What happened in history to show such old fashioned spellings mixed with modern ones? 

0

Answers

  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 10, 2022

    The recordkeeping switched from Latin (Franciscus, Margareta, Johannes, etc.) to English (Francis, Margaret, John, etc.).

    1
  • dduncan4103573
    dduncan4103573 ✭
    January 11, 2022

    Thank you. Do you know what year that was?

    0
  • Julia Szent-Györgyi
    Julia Szent-Györgyi ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 11, 2022 edited January 11, 2022

    It wasn't a single event or time. There are English-language records from centuries earlier than Latin-language records from a different context. (Legal records had different traditions than ecclesiastical ones, for example.) Sometimes the identity of the clerk made all the difference: if the vicar retired and a new hotshot Latin-scholar-wannabe took over, the language could switch from English to Latin for a generation, or until the bishop complained, whichever came first.

    You mentioned typewritten records, which brings up another aspect: many transcriptions silently translated and normalized names. For example, some transcribers would always write "John", regardless of whether the original said Joannes, Johannes, Jn~, or John. Other transcriptions tried to stick closer to the original, but one needs to check the headmatter and contents carefully to figure out what practices were followed.

    1
This discussion has been closed.
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 43.1K Ask a Question
  • 3.4K General Questions
  • 571 FamilySearch Center
  • 6.8K Get Involved/Indexing
  • 645 FamilySearch Account
  • 6.6K Family Tree
  • 5.2K Search
  • 1K Memories
  • 2 Suggest an Idea
  • 478 Other Languages
  • 62 Community News
  • Groups