Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Temple

Ordinances listed as Not Available

RJGKennedy1
RJGKennedy1 ✭✭
January 10, 2022 in Temple

I would like to request ordinances for my great, great aunt Fredericke Sophia Uttech L8MG-25J but they are listed as Not Available?

Tagged:
  • Not available
  • Ordinances
0

Best Answer

  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 10, 2022 Answer ✓

    @RJGKennedy1

    FYI

    I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...

    [ And, I happen to be a Member o the Church ... ]

    Just in passing ...

    I just took a 'look' at Fredericke Sophia UTTECH ( L8MG-25J ).

    I can 'see' possibly WHY, the "Temple" Work, for this individual/person, requires 'FamilySearch' "Support" intervention.

    IF, one takes a 'look' at the "ChangeLog" for this individual/person; specifically, regarding their "Gender"; THEN, one will notice, that there has been, a "Change", to the 'Status', of this individual's/person's, "Gender".

    https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/changelog/L8MG-25J/sex

    One will notice, that the Staus of "Gender", was "Changed", from that of the ORIGINAL Status of 'Male' (pre. 2012 in "New.FamilySearch"), to the Status of 'Female' (2018 in "Family Tree").

    Plus, it is most likely, that the "Change" in "Gender" was initiated; because, of the "Merge"/"Combine" in 2018.

    IF, one takes a 'look' at the "ChangeLog" for this individual/person; specifically, regarding "Merges"/"Combines"; THEN, one will notice, that there has been, a "Merge"/"Combine".

    https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/changelog/L8MG-25J/merges

    Where, the "Gender" of the "Merged"/"Combined" individual/person was that of 'Female'.

    That being the "Deleted" (ie. actually "archived") Friedericke UTTECH ( 2DRJ-YH5 )

    https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/changelog/2DRJ-YH5/sex

    And ...

    Furthermore ...

    IF, one takes a 'look' at the "ChangeLog" for Fredericke Sophia UTTECH ( L8MG-25J ); specifically, regarding their "Name"; THEN, one will notice, that there has been, a number of "Changes", to the "Name", of this individual/person; where, the 'Middle' "Name" of "Sophia" was NOT included until 2020.

    https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/changelog/L8MG-25J/preferred-name

    The aforementioned, possibly helps to clarify, the actual/correct "Gender".

    Now ...

    That Said ...

    It is most likely, that the "Temple" Work, for Fredericke Sophia UTTECH ( L8MG-25J ) has ALREADY been "Completed"; where, the "Gender" was that of 'Male'.

    And ...

    Whereas, it is most likely, that the "Temple" Work, for Friedericke UTTECH ( 2DRJ-YH5 ) has also ALREADY been "Completed"; where, the "Gender" was that of 'Female'.

    As such ...

    It is now a matter, of ensuring, that the "Temple" Work, that is "Displayed", for the resulting Fredericke Sophia UTTECH ( L8MG-25J ), is for the CORRECT "Gender", most likely; being, that of 'Female'.

    That is ALL required to be done by/through 'FamilySearch' "Support".

    Just my thoughts.

    I know, that this certainly does not help/assist; but, I hope, that this may provide you with, some additional, insight; and, perspective.

    Brett

    0

Answers

  • JBPurdie
    JBPurdie mod
    January 10, 2022 edited January 10, 2022

    @RJGKennedy1

    The information Brett posted should answer your Question.

    You can also find answers to your questions by using the Help centre feature which can be found at the top of your FamilySearch page (the circle with the question mark in it)

    0
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 10, 2022

    @JBPurdie

    FYI

    I truly HOPE, that this matter (ie. post) WILL (still) be taken, by a "Moderator" [ ie. 'FamilySearch' "Support" ( Personnel ) ], into the workings, of 'FamilySearch' "Support", to DIRECTLY help/assist the poster ('RJGKennedy1'), regarding the situation/circumstances with the display/recording of "Temple" Work, for the individual/person Fredericke Sophia UTTECH ( L8MG-25J ).

    Brett

    0
  • DMS1737
    DMS1737 ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 10, 2022

    @RJGKennedy1

    This question has been resolved via private message with our Guest.

    0
  • RJGKennedy1
    RJGKennedy1 ✭✭
    January 11, 2022

    @Brett . Thank you. I just didn't go back far enough.

    0
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 11, 2022

    😀

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 30.1K All Categories
  • 24.2K FamilySearch Help
  • 125 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 442 FamilySearch Center
  • 461 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.4K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.7K Indexing
  • 639 Memories
  • 6.5K Temple
  • 322 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups