Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Temple

Beginning Monday, April 10th the temple category will only be viewable to Church members who must be logged into their member account to see it.



If you have questions about your account, please post in the FamilySearch Account category or contact us via another channel here: https://www.familysearch.org/en/fieldops/familysearch-support-contact-us.

work shared before big merge

Susan Fort Johnson
Susan Fort Johnson ✭
January 6, 2022 in Temple

Charles Haberle

1873 – Deceased

 • GS4N-9K2

His initiatory was shared in 2009. This was before the big merge. If you don't know what I'm referring to, send this to someone who knows. This initiatory fell through the merge cracks. I don't want to grab it as I will never get to it in 90 days as I have thousands of names. Please unshare and share again so he is actually in the temple queue. thx!

0

Best Answer

  • Susan Fort Johnson
    Susan Fort Johnson ✭
    January 7, 2022 edited January 7, 2022 Answer ✓

    temple did not print.....it is lost....I've found many of these over the years that Family Search fixed as the ordinance was lost in the merge like many others. Thank you!

    0

Answers

  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    January 6, 2022

    @Susan Fort Johnson

    Susan

    I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...

    [ And, I happen to ne a Member of the Church ... ]

    Just in passing ...

    As I am "Related" ...

    The Problem/issue is, that the 'Status', of that "I", is "Printed" - ie. "Printed" by a "Temple"

    [ ie. In preparation of the Work to be undertaken at the particular "Temple" that printed the "Name" ... ]

    But ...

    That Said ...

    Such is one of those cases; where, that particular Work has fallen in "Limbo" ...

    Where ...

    This scenario most likely applies ...

    Here is a "Knowledge Article", in 'FamilySearch':

    Ordinances reserved between 2007 and 2009 are not completed

    https://www.familysearch.org/en/help/helpcenter/article/my-ancestors-ordinances-were-reserved-between-2007-and-2009-but-are-still-not-done

    Just my thoughts.

    I know, that this does not help/assist; but, I hope, that this provides you with, some insight; and, perspective.

    Brett

    1
  • DoreneHancockSmith
    DoreneHancockSmith ✭
    January 6, 2022

    Hello Susan, Thank you for contacting FamilySearch Community. We will forward your question to a specialty team for review for the Ordinance reserved and shared with Temple between 2007 and 2009. This team may contact you if they need further information. Please watch for a small red dot in the upper right corner which will indicate a response from this team.

    Charles Haberle

    24 September 1873 – Deceased • GS4N-9K2

    Initiatory Reserved and Shared with Temple on 3 May 2009

    Temple Printed

    0
  • DoreneHancockSmith
    DoreneHancockSmith ✭
    January 7, 2022

    Private message sent to guest regarding this issue.

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 30.2K All Categories
  • 24.4K FamilySearch Help
  • 127 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 444 FamilySearch Center
  • 467 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.5K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.7K Indexing
  • 643 Memories
  • 6.6K Temple
  • 326 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.7K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups