Temple completed?

Cgreen02

It is not counting any more ordinances "completed". A month ago I hit 3000 completed and we have completed quite a few since then but it continues to reflect the 3000 number?

Brett .

@Cgreen02

FYI

I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...

[ And, I happen to be a Member of the Church ... ]

Sadly, that number of x3000, is ALL that you will 'see'.

There are TWO (x2) "Conditions", that LIMIT, our List of "Reservations", that we have "Completed":

(1) a MAXIMUM of x3000 Items/Records; and/or,

(2) x25 Months of past Work,

Whichever comes first.

One of the reasons why "Temple" Work, that has been "Completed", DOES NOT show up, on one's List of "Reservations", that we have "Completed" is:

• The "Temple" Work was done more than 25 months ago OR is not one of the most recent 3,000 items of "Temple" Work that one has "Completed.

Where, x3000 items/records of "Temple" Work, equates to some x60 Pages/Screens, on one's List.

Here is a "Knowledge Article", in 'FamilySearch':

I did an ordinance. It is not on my completed ordinances list.

https://www.familysearch.org/en/help/helpcenter/article/i-did-an-ordinance-it-is-not-on-my-completed-ordinances-list

I know, that this does not help/assist; but, I hope, that this may provide you with some, insight; and, perspective.

Brett

Cgreen02

Thanks for the explanation, it does help me understand better the why. I do appreciate you taking the time.

chris

Brett .

@Cgreen02

Chris

I am just glad, that what I provided, could be of some help/assistance.

That is why, this "Community.FamilySearch Forum, was originally established, all those Years ago ...

Users/Patrons, HELPING / ASSISTING, Users/Patrons ...

Unfortunately ...

Some, "Limits", are required ...

Otherwise, it would be TOO much a burden, on the "System(s)" ...

Especially, if EVERY Member, had LISTS, that BIG ...

It would SLOW the "System" ... 'down to a crawl' ...

There are TWO (x2) Databases involved, "Family Tree", of 'FamilySearch''; &, that for the "Temple(s)" (Work) ...

And, they have to "Synchronize" together; and, do so, frequently, to handle, ALL the CONTSTANT updates ...

A massive task ...

Hence, why (some) "Limits" MUST be applied.

As, BOTH of the "Systems", are being constantly used, by countless People, from the many Countries and Unions, from all around the World.

Brett