Why?
Answers
-
This person's ordinance status is not available. Please contact FamilySearch Support if you are a relative and need more information. for Soloma Leach LHJ9-L82
0 -
FYI
I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...
[ And, I happen to be a Member of the Church ... ]
Just in passing ...
As I am "Related" ...
Regarding Soloma LEACH ( LHJ9-L82 )
In answer to your 'Question': Why?
Short Answer: Because, a "Change", in the 'Staus', of "Gender", in regards to a "Merge"/"Combine".
FISRTLY ...
Take a 'look' at the "ChangeLog" for Soloma LEACH ( LHJ9-L82 ), you will notice that there is a CONCERN in regards to the matter of this individual's/person's "Gender".
All: https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/changelog/LHJ9-L82
In particular "Gender" ...
Gender: https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/changelog/LHJ9-L82/sex
SECONDLY ...
Again take a 'look' at the "ChangeLog" for Soloma LEACH ( LHJ9-L82 ), regarding "Merges"/"Combines".
Merges: https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/changelog/LHJ9-L82/merges
You will notice, a "Merge"/"Combine", back in 2017, with a Solomon Brian LEACH ( MX8X-QCM ).
Now, take a 'look' at the "ChangeLog" for Solomon Brian LEACH ( MX8X-QCM )
All: https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/changelog/MX8X-QCM
In particular "Gender" ...
Gender: https://www.familysearch.org/tree/person/changelog/MX8X-QCM/sex
One can 'see' possibly WHY, the "Temple" Work, requires 'FamilySearch' "Support" intervention.
One will notice, that the Staus of "Gender", of the individual/person, was "Changed" from that of the ORIGINAL Status of "Male" (pre. 2012 in "New.FamilySearch"), to the LATER Status of "Female" (2017 = around the time oh the "Merge"/"Combine"), in "Family Tree".
That "Change", in the 'Status', of "Gender", would have a significant impact of the ORIGINAL "Temple" Work, if that was done for the ORIGINAL "Gender"; as, the Status of "Male" - if, in fact, Soloma LEACH ( LHJ9-L82 ), is "Female".
Hence ...
The RESULTING "Temple" Work, NEEDS to be "Checked", to ensure, that such is for the CORRECT "Gender".
IF, the "Temple" Work was done for those, individuals/persons; THEN, the EARLIEST "Temple" Work, for the CORRECT "Gender", NEEDS to prevail.
[ Or, be "Cancelled" (in, "Family Tree", of 'FamilySearch", &, "Temple") ; &, REDONE, for CORRECT "Gender" ... ]
Just my thoughts.
I know, that this does not help/assist; but, I hope that this provides you with some, insight; and, perspective.
Brett
0 -
Soloma Leach LHJ9-L82: The temple ordinances now appear correctly in Family Tree.
0
