Someone has asked me to Unshare an endowment that I shared with the temple 5 years ago. How do I do that? There is a Temple Icon in front of the name.
Simeon Dewsnap 1806-1876
ID # 9N62MR1
Because the ordinances for Simeon Dewsnap 1806-1876 ID # 9N62MR1 have been reserved to the Temple and are already printed, if they are released, it is likely that the ordinances will be duplicated.
Thank you for posting your concern to the Community. It does seem that the ordinance for Simeon Dewsnap should be looked at . We are forwarding you case to a specialty team for review and resolution. You may be contacted by that team if they need more information.
Please watch for a red dot next to the envelope top right on this page.
Simeon Dewsnap 1806-1876 • 9N62-MR1 Endowment Ordinance was shared with the Temple system in 2016, true. But, the Temple recently printed the Ordinance. You will not be able to unreserve the printed Ordinance. Thank you for your patience in this issue.
I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...
[ And, I happen to be a Member of the Church ... ]
Just in passing ...
As an aside ...
The Problem/issue is, that there is NO indication, of WHEN, that "Ordinance" WAS "Printed", by a "Temple" ...
For all intents & purposes ... that "Ordinances", APPEARS to be in LIMBO; even, with that 'Status' of "Printed"...
ie. It appears, that the "Ordinance", is in LIMBO; where, the Work was "Printed", some FIVE (x5) Years ago.
I hereby humbly suggest, to help/assist, in the aforementioned matter, that after the 'Word' of "Printed", that there NEEDS to be, a 'Date'; when, such WAS "Printed" by a "Temple" (and, maybe, even, the Name of the particular "Temple").
ie. Shared with Temple - Printed
.... (1 December 2021 by SLC Temple)
Where, the 'Date'; and, the 'Temple', where "Printed", appear on the line under.
That would certainly 'allay' any concerns, that such was "Stuck" in LIMBO, for an unnecessary length of time ...
As "Moderators" [ ie. "FamilySearch' "Support" ( Personnel ) ] ...
Certainly worth passing such along, to the 'powers to be', for consideration ...
Just my thoughts.
ps: This post, can be, the catalyst, for such ...