Not NEDs
Yes I've seen the labs. No I do not use them.
Report for FS action. Will submit in 2 days.
Philippines, Camarines Sur, Caceres—Registros Parroquiales, 1716–1977 [Parte B] [MMZ2-JJH]
Image has 10 baptism records in table form. Indexer marked as NED.
Well, this next one was not actually marked as NED, but it might as well have been.
Philippines, Camarines Sur, Caceres—Registros Parroquiales, 1716–1977 [Parte B] [MMZ2-F1K]
Image was the same baptismal records in a form type. Indexer put in 1 record that was all "Unreadable" except for being designated a baptism.
And this one was also not actually marked as NED, but it might as well have been.
Philippines, Camarines Sur, Caceres—Registros Parroquiales, 1716–1977 [Parte B] [MMZ2-FTN]
Indexer did 3 of the 10 baptism records fairly well, but bailed on the last 7.
Well, this one is a marginal improvement over the last.
Philippines, Camarines Sur, Caceres—Registros Parroquiales, 1716–1977 [Parte B] [MMZ2-F9P]
Indexer got 5 baptism records in, but only got the child's name entered.
Answers
-
Hello Jerry,
Thank you for reporting these batches,
Please check your messages.
0
