Hephzibah Stiles 2SH6-PMM
Relationship: The wife of my 2nd cousin six times removed
Ordinances not available
Please restore ordinances or make available
@Alice Colby Volkert
I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...
[ And, I happen to be a Member of the Church ... ]
Plus, I am "Related" to Hephzibah STILES ( 2SH6-PMM )
As an aside ...
I would humbly suggest, that the "Temple" Work, for Hephzibah STILES ( 2SH6-PMM ), is "Completed".
The problem/issue involves, one of the two (x2) "Merges"/"Combines", in relation to her.
(1) on "19 August 2019" with Hephzibah STILES ( MGJ7-XTG ); and,
(2) on "14 June 2021", with Hepsibah STILES ( 99PZ-YMM )
It is the FIRST "Merge"/"Combine" "19 August 2019" with Hephzibah STILES ( MGJ7-XTG ); where, the problem/issue lies.
The reason being, that in the record (ie. "ChangeLog") for Hephzibah STILES ( MGJ7-XTG ), there was a "Change" in "Gender", from 'Male', to 'Female'.
Original "Gender' ( 14 June 2012 ) = Male
Changed "Gender" ( 19 August 2019 ) = Female ... [ Coincidently, the 'Time' if the "Merge"/"Combine" ... ]
Hence, WHY, the matter needs to be investigated by 'FamilySearch', to ensure that the "Temple" Work, for the CORRECT "Gender" is applied (ie. Showing/Displayed).
I know that this certainly does not help/assist (as, you ONLY want to know, the actual 'Status'); but, I hope that this gives you some, insight; and, perspective.
Good explanation for the reason, Brett.
Ordinances now show as the should, Alice
By the way ...
That 'Date', of the "Sealing to Spouse", for her SECOND Spouse / Husband Cyrus GATES ( 2Z3F-98P ), 'seems' ODDLY 'out of place', I would have expected, such to be closer, to the 'Date' for the OTHER "Temple" Work.
Although, I have not done, any "Digging' (pun intended) ...
Can I humbly suggest, that 'Date', of the "Sealing to Spouse", for her SECOND Spouse / Husband Cyrus GATES ( 2Z3F-98P ) NEEDS some further investigation ... it just 'seem' oddly, WRONG; and, 'out of place'.
'Thank You' in advance.
Your cooperation, would be greatly appreciated.
Submitted for your, information; attention; and, consideration.
MAY THE LORD BLESS YOU IN THIS IMPORTANT WORK
Agree that the SS to Cyrus Gates 2Z3F-98P showing as being completed in 2009 when other ordinances were much earlier, but that is the date that the database shows.
Could be there was an earlier date - but connected with the original problem that was identified as an incorrect change of gender
'Yes' ... that is exactly WHY, I am asking for such matter, to be investigated ...
ps: Please get this matter, passed along, to the "Department" in 'FamilySearch', that handles such matters.
pps: 'Thank You' in advance.
If indeed there was an earlier ordinances for SS, but based on incorrect gender, then it is invalid