Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Temple

My 6th cousin 5x rem is Gen William Sherman. His Temple Ord says: Cannot Request - Not Available

EdwardsC5
EdwardsC5 ✭
October 2, 2021 edited October 2, 2021 in Temple
  • This person's ordinance status is not available. Please contact FamilySearch Support if you are a relative and need more information. I wouldn't think this is the right place but it's the only place I see to go. Thanks


0

Answers

  • DMS1737
    DMS1737 ✭✭✭✭✭
    October 2, 2021

    Please provide your cousin's name and PID

    Thank you

    0
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    October 3, 2021

    @DMS1737

    'Moderator' (ie. 'FamilySearch' "Support" (Personnel) ]

    That is easy ...

    Gen. William Tecumseh SHERMAN ... ( LYT8-5TZ )

    Brett

    0
  • DMS1737
    DMS1737 ✭✭✭✭✭
    October 3, 2021

    Your question has been forwarded to a specialty team for review and resolution, and is now in progress. Please watch for a red dot near upper right corner for a response from this team.

    Thank you

    0
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    October 3, 2021

    @DMS1737

    'Moderator' (ie. 'FamilySearch' "Support" (Personnel) ]

    FYI

    There are many of us who are elated to:

    Gen. William Tecumseh SHERMAN ... ( LYT8-5TZ )

    [ Myself; being, one of them ... ]

    It would be nice to know what the particular problem/issue is/was.

    I am CEARTIN that the "Temple" Work for Gen. William Tecumseh SHERMAN ... ( LYT8-5TZ ) would have ALREADY been "Completed".

    Of course, it could most certainly be, some the x16 "Merges"/"Combines" that occurred.

    ▬ 2018

    9VLR-X8V

    ▬ 2019

    KCDB-JN9

    ▬ 2021 (ALL x14 on the SAME day )

    KZCR-GCM; KHC4-3Q3; KZ45-XWT; KCL4-H9H; K64H-7B9; LN3N-GFK; LXXW-84L; K6SZ-LKS; LNS1-1TD; 9MT6-JNG; K8R2-3HF; LNW5-NL9; 9SR6-V6W; and, KHSH-JKR

    It is TRULY, ashame; and, disappointing, that one of the pre.2012 individuals/persons ( eg. Preferably, either, 9VLR-X8V; or KCDB-JN9; or, even, KHSH-JKR), from "New.FamilySearch", could not have been the "Surviving" individual/person, rather than one "Created", in 2018, in "Family Tree".

    Question:

    Is there ANY chance that either, 9VLR-X8V; or KCDB-JN9; as, being one of the pre.2012 individuals/persons from "New.FamilySearch", can be "Resurrected"; and, MADE the "Surviving" individual/person; as, the aforementioned would certainly be MORE appropriate, rather than one "Created", in 2018, in "Family Tree".

    Could that ALSO please be investigated.

    Please Advise.

    'Thank You' in advance.

    Brett

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 30K All Categories
  • 24.2K FamilySearch Help
  • 123 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 442 FamilySearch Center
  • 461 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.4K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.7K Indexing
  • 637 Memories
  • 6.5K Temple
  • 321 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups