Home› Welcome to the FamilySearch Community!› FamilySearch Help› Temple

Beginning Monday, April 10th the temple category will only be viewable to Church members who must be logged into their member account to see it.



If you have questions about your account, please post in the FamilySearch Account category or contact us via another channel here: https://www.familysearch.org/en/fieldops/familysearch-support-contact-us.

wife missing on husband's ordinance page

Pam Nelson Peterson
Pam Nelson Peterson ✭
September 29, 2021 edited September 29, 2021 in Temple

James Watson LHZZ-QJC - 2nd wife Mary "Polley" Carsley M67K-QQG is missing on his ordinance page along with their sealing, but shows on her ordinance page.

Please help. Thanks Pam

Tagged:
  • Missing ordinances
0

Best Answers

  • DianaHawks
    DianaHawks mod
    September 29, 2021 Answer ✓

    Private message to guest on the progress of this issue

    0
  • Pam Nelson Peterson
    Pam Nelson Peterson ✭
    September 29, 2021 Answer ✓

    Many thanks to all of you fabulous FS workers for helping to solve this problem!

    Pam

    0

Answers

  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 29, 2021

    @Pam Nelson Peterson

    Pam

    I am just another 'lowly' User/Patron ...

    [ And, I happen to be a Member of the Church ... ]

    Certainly ... INTERSETING ... to say the least ...

    I would humbly suggest, that the reason, for the problem/issue, may be the considerable number of "Merges"/"Combines" for Mary "Polley" CARSLEY ( M67K-QQG ).

    Mary "Polley" CARSLEY ( M67K-QQG ) has some Seven (x7) "Merges"/"Combines"; as, evidenced, in her "ChangeLog".

    But ...

    That Said ...

    NONE of those "Merges"/"Combines", were actioned AFTER that "Sealing" in April 2019.

    And ...

    There have been NO "Merges"/"Combines" for James WATSON ( LHZZ-QJC )

    It will interesting to 'see' the outcome ...

    Brett

    ps: I just got interested; and, took a quick 'look'; as, Mary "Polley" CARSLEY ( M67K-QQG ) is in my "Ancestral" Lines.

    0
  • Pam Nelson Peterson
    Pam Nelson Peterson ✭
    September 29, 2021

    Brett,

    Mary "Polley" Carsley M67K-QQG is my 4th Great Grandaunt. I descend through her brother John Carsley III. My FS helper thinks the disappearance of Mary "Polley" and their SS on James' ordinance page is due to an incorrect merge of Mary "Polley" into Mary Davis, the first wife, back in 2015. Strange that Mary "Polley" still shows as James' wife in that case. She has requested FS undo that merge and thinks that should restore the SS. I hope that works. I have untangled a number of incorrect merges before, but I have my hands full on other lines right now. If FS will do this one for me I am thrilled and very grateful! How do you connect?

    Pam

    0
  • Brett .
    Brett . ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 29, 2021

    @Pam Nelson Peterson

    Pam

    'Yes' ... I believe that your "Helper" may be correct.

    'FamilySearch' most likely will not do that for you.

    Do you want me to take a look at that for you?

    Brett

    0
  • Bryan54
    Bryan54 ✭✭✭✭✭
    September 29, 2021

    James Watson LHZZ-QJC: The temple ordinances now appear correctly in Family Tree.

    0
  • Pam Nelson Peterson
    Pam Nelson Peterson ✭
    September 29, 2021

    Brett,

    Glad FS was able to fix it!

    Thanks for your offer to help.

    Pam

    0
Clear
No Groups Found

Categories

  • 30.2K All Categories
  • 24.3K FamilySearch Help
  • 127 Get Involved
  • 2.7K General Questions
  • 443 FamilySearch Center
  • 465 FamilySearch Account
  • 4.5K Family Tree
  • 3.4K Search
  • 4.7K Indexing
  • 640 Memories
  • 6.6K Temple
  • 326 Other Languages
  • 34 Community News
  • 6.6K Suggest an Idea
  • Groups