Beginning Monday, April 10th the temple category will only be viewable to Church members who must be logged into their member account to see it.
If you have questions about your account, please post in the FamilySearch Account category or contact us via another channel here: https://www.familysearch.org/en/fieldops/familysearch-support-contact-us.
My distant ancestor, William Frost, of Nottinghamshire was attached to a spouse and children that belonged to another William Frost of Warwickshire, but the parents were correct. There were essentially two William Frosts combined into one Family Tree individual. I separated them by creating another William Frost.
The pre-existing William Frost (LZXY-FX4) is still connected to the spouse but removed my ancestor's parents, although they were sealed. The new individual I created (who is my ancestor) is connected to their parents. Their new ID number is G8ZP-3LP. However, the sealing to the parents was removed from Family Tree because I had to create another person to separate the two individuals/families.
In short, I would like the sealing for William Frost (G8ZP-3LP) and his parents, Henry Frost (LZD6-BM8) and Mary Brailsford (2V4S-VQ9) to be added to Family Tree because they have technically been completed [on 4 May 2011 in New Zealand]. They are simply no longer shown on family tree because I had to create another William Frost.
The ordinance was formerly between the above Henry Frost and Mary Brailsford with the son being the William Frost with the ID number LZXY-FX4, who is now William Frost with the ID number G8ZP-3LP.
Your question will be forwarded to a specialty team for review and resolution. You may be contacted by that team if they need to gather more information.0
William Frost G8ZP-3LP: The temple ordinances now appear correctly in Family Tree.0